A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,00, and Defendant B and Defendant C by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

The Defendants are the defendants.

On June 2, 2017, around 23:50 on June 2, 2017, the Defendants identified the circumstances leading up to the report by H of the police box affiliated with the Seoul Western Police Station G police station, dispatched after receiving a report by 112. Defendant A: (a) whether the aforementioned H “I am, h, and h, the daily treatment of which was carried out.”

“The above G police box, which took a bath as it is, was sent one time to the left hand, and Defendant B took a bath to the above I who tried to arrest the Defendant A in flagrant offender under the suspicion of interference with the performance of his official duties, and carried the arms of the above I in hand, and Defendant C took the arms of the above I in hand, and Defendant C took the arms of the above I in hand, and committed assault.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the 112 reporting process of police officers and legitimate execution of duties concerning arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Some statements concerning the Defendants in the police interrogation protocol

1. Each police statement made to I and J;

1. Each statement K and L;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (Attachment to a photograph of the upper part of a victimized police officer);

1. Articles 136(1) and 30 of the relevant Criminal Act concerning criminal facts

1. Selection of each fine (the Defendants are against their mistakes, Defendant A and C have no record of being punished for the same kind of crime, and Defendant B has no record of being punished for the same crime, taking into account the circumstances, such as the first offender);

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, each of the Defendants’ detention in a workhouse

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act