2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Plaintiff

A (G) On March 27, 2011, as a result of the test conducted by MRI (MRI and self-recogic image test) at H I's level located in Daejeon-gu, Daejeon on March 31, 201, it was diagnosed as the escape certificate of a congratory signboard for 4-5 pages.

Plaintiff

A was transferred to the defendant hospital operated by school juristic person E on March 31, 2011 on the same day.

Defendant F diagnosed the Plaintiff as the main pain (e.g., tamper, the right rayer, etc.) and Malalian test in the above I, based on the results of the 4-5 tample escape test in the above I.

Plaintiff

A was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital on the same day, and the Defendant F performed an operation to remove the conical signboards of the Plaintiff’s No. 4-5 pages on April 4, 201 (hereinafter “the first operation of this case”).

Plaintiff

A, after the first operation of the instant case, complained of the symptoms of satisfaction sewage on April 7, 201 while being hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital.

Accordingly, around 00:30 on April 8, 201, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital conducted an inspection by MMM (hereinafter “the instant inspection by MMM”) on the 00:30 on the part of the Defendant Hospital, and the result of the reading that “the occurrence, etc. of agricultural or fishery species on the part of the surgery” was “the occurrence, etc. of blood species.”

Considering the right satisfaction sewage symptoms and other circumstances alleged by the plaintiff A, the defendant F stated that it is difficult for the plaintiff A to clearly diagnose the causes of symptoms only with the reading result, and that it can clearly diagnose the operation division, and that the plaintiff A and his family members can clearly identify the causes of symptoms when opening the operation division.

At around 12:00 on April 8, 201, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital confirmed the Plaintiff’s surgery department at the operating department, and discovered the blood species and conical signboards from the surgery department.

Accordingly, Defendant F performed an operation to remove blood species and escape forecast signboards (hereinafter referred to as “the second operation of this case”).