손실보상금
1. The Defendant’s KRW 2,696,320 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from January 12, 2018 to November 8, 2018, and the following.
1. Details of ruling;
(a) Project approval and public notice - Housing redevelopment project (B) - Public notice of the Housing Redevelopment Improvement Project (III) - Public notice: Defendant: C public notice of Ansan-si on September 22, 2015; D public notice of Ansan-si on March 3, 2017;
B. The Gyeonggi-do Local Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation on November 27, 2017 (hereinafter “instant ruling of expropriation”): Land listed in the attached list owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant land”) and obstacles described in the same list (hereinafter “instant obstacles”): Compensation for losses: KRW 314,49,600 for the instant land, and KRW 9,767,050 for the instant obstacles ( separate from delay charges of KRW 13,92,320 for delay): The starting date of expropriation: An appraisal corporation: An appraisal corporation, vice governor, F appraisal corporation, etc. (hereinafter “appraisal”) on January 11, 2018.
C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on June 21, 2018 (hereinafter “the instant ruling”) - Details of the ruling: Each of the instant compensation for losses: KRW 323,156,100 for the instant land; and KRW 10,263,980 for the instant obstacles ( separate from additional charges of delay 14,387,300 for the instant obstacles) - An appraisal corporation: G sports appraisal corporation and H appraisal corporation (hereinafter “appraisal”)
D. Results of the appraiser I’s appraisal (hereinafter “the above appraiser”) - Contents of the appraisal: Each of the instant damages amounting to KRW 325,962,00 for the instant land, and KRW 10,154,400 for the instant obstacles. The appraisal report by the above appraiser is not considered as the Plaintiff’s share (6/10) for the instant land and the obstacles, and thus, the appraisal result is corrected as the appraised value taking into account the Plaintiff’s share ratio (based on recognition). As such, the appraisal report by the above appraiser is not in dispute (based on recognition), the appraisal result is corrected as the appraised value taking into account the Plaintiff’s share ratio. [The grounds for recognition] There is no dispute, each entry in the evidence No. 2, 3, and 4,
2. The assertion and judgment
A. The plaintiff's assertion.