If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On October 1, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around October 1, 2012, at the D cafeteria located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, in the place where the victim E, its partners, F, employees, and customers are located; and (b) notwithstanding the fact that the victim did not interfere with the sale of the said shop, the Defendant refers to the victim; (c) and (d) during the process, “I am a large number of persons who died of a sing-sing singing-sing-sing-sing-sing-sing-sing-s-s-ing-s-s-ing-s-ing-s-s-s-ing-s-ing-s-ing-s-ing-s-ing-s-king-s-king-s-king-king-king-king-king-king-king-king-king-king-king

I have the beginning of the objection. I have the death of any hand.

C. L. L.C.

(a) the entry into force of this title;

This openings, booming, and eating.

In the same case of Germany;

(1) The complainant was the first one.

The governance accusation should be followed by a clicker, and how you move back to the 1st head of the year which caused the complaint.

We see how we die or dieer.

H. The honor of the victim was damaged by openly pointing out false facts, such as the expression “after the back of the accusation,” “after the chest,” etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Recording notes and written confirmation of facts;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (F telephone conversations for reference);

1. Relevant Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;