The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving cars B.

1. On May 26, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for a violation of the Road Traffic Act and a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) on the grounds of a violation of the Road Traffic Act, etc. at the astronomical support of the Daejeon District Court, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for a violation of the Road Traffic Act on the grounds of a violation of the Road Traffic Act. On December 5, 2011, the Daejeon District Court issued a summary order of three million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving under drinking), and on April 21, 2014, issued a summary order of five million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving under drinking), and on January 25, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving under drinking under the influence of alcohol) at the Seocho District Court's branch of the Daejeon District Court.

Defendant was punished for driving a motor vehicle, etc. under the influence of alcohol as above, and was driving the motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol with approximately 0.094% alcohol concentration in the blood at approximately 13km from the front of the mutual infinite cafeteria in the city of Busan, without obtaining a driver’s license around March 7, 2020, to the same new finite 688 greenhouse-ro, male, Myeong-ri.

2. The Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) driven a motor vehicle in the above Spoon area around the date and time set forth in paragraph 1, and proceeded with the two lanes of the two lanes of the two lanes of the two lanes of the Asan-si, male 688, Masan-ro, Masan-ro.

At night, as a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle was at night, there was a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle and prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as described in paragraph 1, has been negligent in driving on the right side of the Defendant while driving on a two-lane beyond the vehicle due to negligence in the course of duty and driving on the two-lane, and has shocked into the front side of the Defendant’s driving, and has continued to stop on the other side of the vehicle.