A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months and for three months, respectively.

Defendant

On April 21, 2010, A was sentenced to imprisonment of one year and six months with prison labor in the Jeju District Court for night buildings, larceny, etc., and the execution of the sentence was terminated at the Jeju District Court on September 2, 201. On June 12, 2014, the Cheongju District Court was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, and the judgment was finalized on June 20, 2014. Defendant B was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Jeju District Court on April 14, 201 and completed the execution of the sentence at the Jeju District Court on September 15, 201. On November 28, 2013, the judgment became final and conclusive on March 22, 2014.

1. The Defendants committed joint crimes with Q, together with A Q, went before the house of the victim AS (n, 37 years of age) located in Pu in Pu on February 15, 2012 and around 11:00, and Q reported the network around it, and the Defendants entered the said house through open door, and entered the said house and entered the said house at the location of the victim, the market price of which is approximately KRW 1,00,000,000 in the amount of KRW 30,000,000 in the market price.

As a result, the defendants stolen the victim's property together with Q.

2. Defendant A, at around 15:00 on September 11, 2012, at the place of business of a pair of cars located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Yangcheon-gu, Yangcheon-gu, 1013-7, Defendant A would pay KRW 755,320 per month for 36 months to employees under the name and infinite Co., Ltd., A, the injured party, who purchased car from AT when purchasing the car from 1013-7, a pair of cars.

In making a false statement, “AT requires an employee under the name of the said employee to submit documents related to loans, etc.”

However, the Defendant had an obligation of KRW 40 million due to the aggravation of the management of the steel business operated at the time, and there was no intention or ability to repay even if the Defendant received a loan from the injured party due to the absence of any particular property or income.

The defendant.