사용료
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
1. Whether the appeal of this case is lawful
A. Article 196(1) of the Civil Procedure Act provides that the first service by public notice shall take effect only after two weeks have passed since the date of its implementation. Meanwhile, Article 157 of the Civil Act provides that the first day of the period shall not be included in the calculation of the period if the period begins at midnight, but the first day shall be included in the calculation of the period. Article 170 of the Civil Procedure Act provides that the calculation of the period shall be made in accordance with the Civil Act. Thus, in cases where the original of the judgment was served by public notice after the declaration of judgment, the time when the service by public notice takes effect shall be zero (2:0:0:0:00:0:00:00; 2:00:0:0:0:0:0:00; 20:0:00; 20:00:00; 20:00:00; 20:00:00; 25; 2000:00,0000,000) from the first day after the date when the service by public notice became effective.
3) Therefore, the Defendant filed the instant appeal on August 26, 2015, which was the day following the expiration of the appeal period, and thus failed to comply with the appeal period stipulated under Article 396 of the Civil Procedure Act. (B) Whether the subsequent appeal is lawful or not, under Article 173(1) of the Civil Procedure Act, the term “reasons for which the parties cannot be held liable” refers to the reasons why the parties could not comply with the appeal period, even though the parties fulfilled their duty of care to conduct procedural acts.