At around 10:00 on July 3, 2013, the Defendant inhaled about one half of the four primary products in a white plastic paper by inserting it into the entrance of the wing site and exposing it up to one hour at around 09:30 on July 3, 2013. At around 09:30 on the same day, the Defendant, purchased at the iron store located in Sinsisido, in a lutona product located in Sinsido, in a white plastic paper.

Accordingly, the defendant inhaled toxic chemicals that cause interest, hallucination, or anesthesia.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocols of seizure, photographs of seized articles (mainboards and vinyl paper);

1. Application of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes to drillings (the urine, which is a seized article, and hallucinogenic substances appraisal report on the main dicide);

1. Even though the defendant had a record of having been sentenced to imprisonment several times for the same crime, it is necessary to strictly punish the defendant in that he/she committed the instant crime, even though the reason for sentencing under Article 58 Subparag. 3 and Article 43(1) of the Poisonous Chemicals Control Act regarding the relevant criminal facts and Article 58 Subparag. 3 of the Poisonous Chemicals Control

However, in consideration of all the sentencing conditions, such as the fact that the defendant has no record of punishment for the same kind of crime for the last five to six years, and that the defendant reflects the mistake, the punishment as the order shall be determined.