However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[criminal history] The Defendant, at the Daegu District Court on July 10, 2008, issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking) at the Daegu District Court, and on June 9, 2014, issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking) at the same court on at least two occasions.

[Criminal facts]

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is a person who is engaged in driving a car at CBelgium.

On July 18, 2017, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol content of 0.076% during blood transfusions. On July 18, 2017, the Defendant driven a Belgium master car and driven the front road of the E cafeteria located in Daegu-gu Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, along the two-lanes of the way off from the side of the village amusement park to the network per minute.

In such cases, the driver has a duty of care to live well on the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty of operation of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant, by negligence, neglected the duty of the front week while under the influence of alcohol, tried to see the front part of the victim F (16 tax) driving in the same direction as the Defendant’s car, without a license plate for the victim F (16 tax) driving.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the above negligence that caused injury to the victim F, such as a 6-day medical care for approximately seven weeks, a stoke in the upper stoke, etc., and the victim G (17 years old) who was the stoke of the damaged stoke, to undergo approximately two-day medical care for the victim G (17 years old).

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) driven a Belgium car under the influence of alcohol with 0.076% alcohol concentration in blood at the time and place specified in paragraph 1.

Accordingly, the Defendant, who violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A H statement;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver in charge;