beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.08.31 2016가단262325

손해배상(자)

Text

1. The defendant 6,352,941 won, plaintiff B, plaintiff C, plaintiff D, plaintiff E, plaintiff F, plaintiff G, and plaintiff H respectively.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. (i) On September 5, 2016, around 08:15, 2016, I driven an electric bicycle and proceeded with 30 door-to-door distance from the front south-gun of the Gum-gun of the Gum-gun of the Gum-gun of the Gum-gun of the Gum-gun of the Gum-gun of the Gum-gun of the Gum-gun of the Gum-gun of the Gum-gun of the Gum-gun, without stopping the signal from the direction of the movement to the stop signal, and it was caused by an accident where the part of the electric bicycle was shocked on the front part of the J vehicle (hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”).

B. On the ground of the instant accident, I died, and the Plaintiff A’s spouse (the shares in inheritance 3/17) of the deceased I (the deceased), the remaining Plaintiffs are the children of the deceased (the shares in inheritance 2/17), and the Defendant is an insurance company that entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1 to 3 evidence, purport of the whole pleadings

B. On the other hand, the judgment of the plaintiffs sought liability for damages caused by the accident of this case (Funeral expenses and consolation money of the deceased). Since the defendant denies the liability for damages on the ground that the accident of this case occurred entirely by the deceased's negligence, the defendant is obligated to compensate the plaintiffs for damages caused by the accident of this case, taking full account of the following circumstances acknowledged by comprehensively taking into account the overall purport of the arguments and the video as a whole, the driver's negligence of the defendant can be sufficiently recognized, and the defendant is obligated to compensate the plaintiffs for the damages caused by the accident of this case.

(i) The driver of a vehicle who wishes to pass through the intersection in compliance with the running signal changed from the intersection to the stop signal or from the end signal to the stop signal to the intersection because the vehicle in transit to the intersection is bell by violating the signal, and therefore the signal was changed to the stop signal to the stop signal, the driver of the vehicle who wishes to pass through the intersection in compliance with the running signal.