절도
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. On April 16, 2017, the Defendant: (a) on the part of the victim E in a DNA farm located in Taean-gun, Taean-gun, Taean-gun; and (b) on the part of the victim E, the Defendant: (c) on the part of the victim E, loaded a natural stone worth KRW 8 million in the market price of G in Taean-gun F, Taean-gun; (d) on the part of the victim E, 6 rocks of natural stone in the undeveloped market at the time of the instant farm; (e) on the part of the victim E, the Defendant stolen
2. Although the victim E is admitted as evidence consistent with the fact that the Defendant and the instant natural seat are jointly owned by the Defendant and the victim’s statement and the intent to confirm the facts of G preparation, this is difficult to believe in light of the witness G and H’s respective legal statements ( rather, according to the witness G and H’s respective legal statements, the Defendant appears to own the instant natural seat solely). Other evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone proves that the instant facts charged were proven without any reasonable doubt.
It is insufficient to view it, and there is no other evidence to prove it.
Thus, the facts charged of this case constitute a case where there is no proof of a crime, and thus, a judgment of innocence is rendered after the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the defendant does not consent to the public notice of the judgment of innocence, and thus, the purport of public notice of the judgment of innocence is not declared under the proviso of Article