On June 28, 2002, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in the Incheon District Court on May 11, 2006, and three years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in the Seoul Central District Court on May 11, 2006, and on August 12, 2010, the same court was sentenced to three years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in the same court on August 29, 2010, and the same kind of criminal punishment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment,

1. On February 12:58, 2015, the Defendant: (a) had access to the victim C by taking advantage of the gapss in the front line of subway No. 1 located in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, in the subway No. 299-1 to the East Station; and (b) has habitually stolen the mobile phone number with which the market price of the female’s ownership is unknown in the Australia money in question; and (c) has taken off the mobile phone number with which the female’s market price is unknown.

2. On February 15, 2015, around 14:14, 2015, the Defendant stolen the victim D by taking advantage of the gapss around the subway lines 4 in subway lines located in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, to the tamping station, from the subway lines 213 to the tamping station, and then temporarily stolen the victim D by taking out one cellular phone machine with which the market price of his female in Australia is unknown, and one foreign exchange credit card, from which it is difficult to find out the market price of his female in Australia.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of examination of the accused;

1. Each statement of D and C;

1. A written appraisal (No. 1);

1. A report on the occurrence of theft incident;

1. Each investigation report (Evidence records, six pages, eight pages, twenty pages);

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Criminal records, investigation reports (Attachment of written judgments), and current status of personal identification and confinement;

1. Habituality of the holding: Application of the damp-style Act and subordinate statutes in light of the records of each crime, the frequency of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the repeated crimes of the same kind in the holding; and