Each of the facts charged in this case.

To the extent that the facts charged in the indictment do not disadvantage the defendant's exercise of his/her right to defense, some correction or correction was made according to facts obtained through the examination of evidence.

[criminal records] On January 22, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for a violation of the Illegal Check Control Act at the Seoul Western District Court on June 2, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 30, 2015.

[2] From around 30 years ago, the Defendant changed the trade name to F around 207 while engaging in the wholesale and retail business for children, and from around December 2011, the Defendant started the agency business and entrusted the sales to G companies that received goods bearing a trademark, such as “E, from the supplier company after establishing the G around August 2012, and entrusted the goods with the sales to G companies that contracted with the company after receiving the goods bearing a trademark, such as “E,” etc. from the supplier company, after receiving the goods bearing the trademark from the supplier company, and received the goods with the goods bearing the trademark, and operated the goods in the way of receiving the remaining amount after deducting 35% of the goods sales price entrusted to each agency after receiving the security deposit from each agency.

In that sense, from spring of 2012, a finished product of clothing has been supplied to G from spring of 2012

H was unable to pay approximately KRW 777 million among the supplied goods of the clothing in 2012 and KRW 895 million among the supplied goods of the spring in 2013, and KRW 200,000,000 among the supplied goods of the clothing in 2013. On June 25, 2013, H filed a lawsuit against G to claim payment of KRW 1.672 million against G, and G was provisionally seized. G was supplied with the first truck in 2013 from H on May 9, 2013 and was supplied with the second truck in 200, and each agency was not supplied with the second truck in 200,000, and the supply and inventory management of each agency was not carried out smoothly.

Since then, the price that has not been paid even after being supplied with the finished product from the supplier companies continues to be accumulated, and the unpaid price to the claim group of eight suppliers around January 2014 is about KRW 5.445 billion and about I.