유류분반환 청구의 소
All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiffs.
1. Basic facts
A. The network E (hereinafter “the deceased”) married with the network F, resulting in Plaintiff A and B, and thereafter the network E re-concing with Defendant C.
B. The Deceased died on April 15, 2019 and his inheritance commenced.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination
A. The deceased and the Defendants, despite being aware that they would inflict damages on the plaintiffs, who are entitled to legal reserve of inheritance, have donated real estate and deposits to the Defendants, so the Defendants are obligated to return legal reserve of inheritance to the Plaintiffs.
B. The Plaintiffs asserted that the Defendants infringed the Plaintiffs’ legal reserve of inheritance by receiving property donated from the deceased, but the evidence submitted by the Plaintiffs alone is insufficient to acknowledge the fact that the Defendants donated property from the deceased and infringed the Plaintiffs’ legal reserve of inheritance, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise.
The plaintiffs' claims are without merit.
3. The plaintiffs' claims are all dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.