However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On August 24, 2017, at around 11:00 on August 24, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of alcohol in a restaurant operated by the Victim C in Ischeon-si; (b) the Defendant was able to have the legal grounds for receiving 3,000 won or more of the value of the alcoholic beverage; (c)

Woo Business Permit Doz. Doz. Doz.

Whether an illegal business is not illegal

The report will be reported.

The term "catch" means Si expenses, and the victim shall calculate the value of drinking and Ghana.

“ .....” among customers with high-quality defects, .... 1 f.b. so as to cover salt acid in seesee

The circh flob flob flob flob flob flob, etc., and blob flob flob flob 15 minutes.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

2. The Defendant insults police officers on August 24, 2017, at the restaurant as stated in paragraph 1 of around 11:15 around around 24:15, “A person under the influence of alcohol booms the pedal.”

“I” means the victim F, the victim G, the victim H, and the victim I, who is a police officer affiliated with the police box of the Leecheon Police Station E (Sacheon Police Station) called upon receipt of the report, and the victim I, with the restaurant operator and the customer, and with the other merchants, “Irrefind with the sponse, Irrefinite.”

좆 같은 새끼! 괴물 같이 생긴 새끼! 네 얼굴 좀 봐라, 짭새 새끼들아! 니들 부모, 마누라, 새끼 얼굴 좀 봐라!

The victims were openly insulting by openly hacking the hacker, such as the Dracker’s hack.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Each complaint filed by I, H, G, F, and C;

1. Application of the statute of the respective statement protocol to C and I

1. Articles 314 (1) and 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes. Article 50 (Inter-Korean Crimes of Defluence against Police Officers)

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution is that the defendant was subject to multiple punishments by obstructing his/her duties, but again became subject to the instant crime, and even though he/she was punished by obstructing the performance of official duties, the police officers are punished.