However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 24, 2015, at around 02:24, the Defendant reported that “the police officer was assaulted at Dda” on the front of the Celb in Gumi-si B, and reported that “the police officer is not dispatched, and promptly called for dispatch,” and “the police officer is not dispatched,” and that “the police officer is not dispatched, and is called promptly called.”

피고인은 위 추가 신고를 접수하고 출동한 같은 경찰서 소속 경찰관 G, H이 또다시 피고인에게 신고 경위를 물어보는 것에 화가 나 “씨발 놈들아, 일 처리를 이따위로 하냐, 이러고도 세금 받아 쳐 먹고 사느냐”라고 욕을 하면서 위 H을 향하여 주먹을 1회 휘두르고, 왼쪽 발로 H의 오른 다리를 2회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The statement of H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to an investigation report (as to this case);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act provides that when an examination is conducted after he or she is left after his or her misconduct is taken

1. The main sentence of Article 62-2 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act on Probation;