2. In full view of the overall sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of the instant judgment and the fact that the Defendant committed each of the instant offenses during the period of repeated crimes, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable as it is too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

However, the lower court’s first and third case number is obvious that it is a clerical error in the name of “2013 highest 2842, 3055 combined, 3218”, “2013 highest 2842, 3055, and 3218 combined,” and thus, ex officio correction is made pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Regulations on Criminal Procedure.

.