Text

All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Determination of unfair sentencing by both parties on the assertion of unfair sentencing may be taken into account the fact that the defendant recognized the crime, against the mistake, supported four children by his wife and divorce after divorce. However, despite the fact that the defendant, around April 2012 and around July 2012, performed a crackdown on drilling of the instant wastewater storage tank on two occasions before the enforcement of the sentence on September 13, 2012, he stored and discharged wastewater in the above storage tank. The defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for imprisonment for the same crime, which became final and conclusive in August of the same crime, and again committed the crime in this case even during the grace period, while the judgment became final and conclusive, the hazard of the wastewater discharged by the defendant is serious, and soil contamination is difficult to recover, and taking into account all the records and arguments of the crime in this case, such as the defendant's age, health, character, home environment, motive and background of the crime, method, method, and consequence before and after the crime, etc., imprisonment (Article 8).