However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 1, 2014, at around 11:00, the Defendant cited one hand room equivalent to KRW 130,000,00 in the market price where the victim C had displayed a cre in the cresh of the snow caused by the victim C, which was operated by the victim C, and stolen it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A simple statement in C;

1. Application of the police investigation report (CCTV-related Acts and subordinate statutes);

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing in Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] : The scope of sentence compared with the sentencing range in which punishment is mitigated (1 to 6 months) by category 1 (the thief) (the thief) (the thief) and the sentencing range in which punishment is not imposed: one month to 6 months (the decision of sentence is made]: four months of imprisonment; two years of suspension of execution; two years of probation; identical criminal records (the thief, four times, and fine) in favor of the person under probation; reflects his wrong; reflects his criminal records; agree with the person under probation; degree of damage to the victim; and recover from damage. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds above.