beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.02.18 2015고단4385

공문서위조등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal record] On May 28, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. in the support of Suwon Friwon, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 8, 2015.

[Criminal facts]

1. The Defendant, while working for an insurance agency (ju)C, was willing to prepare a financial guarantee that sets up D as a joint and several surety by using the chapter of D’s seal impression kept while claiming insurance proceeds.

On April 27, 2010, the Defendant stated “D and [resident registration number] column” in the column of “Financial Guarantee” (name of joint and several guarantors) at the office of (State) Dong-si, Seoul, and held in the column of “D and [resident registration number].”

D’s seal imprint also affixed the head of the Gu.

In this respect, the Defendant forged a copy of “financial guarantee” in the name of D, a private document on rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 1, submitted a forged “financial guarantee document” as described in paragraph 1, to G, who is the president of the original domicile of the C (State) having knowledge of the forgery, and exercised the document as if it were duly constituted.

3. From May 2012 to March 2013, the Defendant was serving as the head of H Limited Company’s original branch or Daegu branch office, and was engaged in the management of employees belonging to the branch office, and the conclusion of a partnership company that entered into a contract with H Limited Company to enter into a sales advertisement contract with the said company.

A. On July 26, 2012, the Defendant committed a crime against the victim I is obliged to return to the Company the deposit amount of KRW 10 million once to the Company at the original branch office of the J and H limited liability company located in J and 101, and the victim I, the office lessor, “in order to renew the lease contract, the Defendant shall return the deposit amount of KRW 10 million to the Company.

In order to return to the company, it shall be deposited into the account in the first place.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not receive the direction from H Limited Company to return the leased deposit, and the leased deposit from the victim.