Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be prohibited.

Defendant

A is the driver of the vehicle B, and the new special case of the Defendant Limited Liability Company is the owner of the vehicle.

1. Defendant A, at around 13:42 on June 14, 2005, loaded rocks on the said B vehicle in excess of 10 tons of a stable, 10.34 tons of a stable, 3 10.22 tons of a total weight, and 44.72 tons of a total weight of 4.72 tons on the 2nd stable, Y-si, Y-si, Y-si, Y-si, Y-si, Y-si, Y-si, Y-si;

2. The Defendant limited liability company’s special case is that the Defendant A, an employee of the Defendant company, operated the said vehicle in the same condition as Paragraph A(1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by Defendant A in this Court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reports on detection of vehicles violating restriction on operation;

1. Articles 83 (1) 2 and 54 (1) of the Road Act (in cases where the provisions of applicable Acts to crimes and punishment are applied to the accused limited liability company, Article 86 of the Road Act shall be added and fines shall be imposed);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act shall be confined in a workhouse (Defendant A);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.