However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 9, 2017, at the front of the C User's Office located in Gangnam-si B, the Defendant, upon receiving a report on the use of a bicycle in front of the C User's Office located in Gangnam-si, and committed assault by the Defendant, such as cutting off a fluence by a police officer affiliated with E and 119 first-aid staff members of the Gangnam-gu District District D, which called the Defendant, and soliciting a slope F of the same district unit dispatched upon receiving a request for support to go to the patrol lane hospital, the Defendant called the "fluence at time" and "fluence at the patrol engine".

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the protection and protective measures of the people's lives, bodies, and properties of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the Daehan service site (A) facsimile, the 112 Report Processing Schedule Fax, or a copy of a police officer's certificate;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the last day, in consideration of the past criminal records, the health status of the accused, etc.