The appeal is dismissed.

A. From July 2011, the Defendant, while lending KRW 1 million to E, did not deduct KRW 100,000 per month interest and KRW 100,000 per month.

Nevertheless, as the E appeared as a witness of the Daejeon District Court Branch Decision 2012DaMa1296 on May 5, 2013, 2013, and made a false testimony that “the Defendant was 120% prior to the Defendant’s appearance,” it shall not be deemed as filing a complaint against E.

B. The court below’s sentence of unfair sentencing (the fine of KRW 5,00,000) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The lower court duly adopted and examined the allegation of mistake in the following circumstances: (i) in the case of the Daejeon District Court Decision 2012 High Court Decision 2012 High Court Decision 1296, the Defendant lent money to the 10-day taxi officers while working in K; (ii) the Defendant borrowed money from the Defendant “F, E, Q, Q, R, J, I, T, H, H, U” (Evidence No. 42, 44). The Defendant also lent money from the investigative agency to E and Q (Evidence No. 59 of the Evidence No. 59); (iii) the Defendant lent money from 00,000,000 won to 10,000,000,000 won (Evidence No. 131 of the Evidence No. 131 of the Record); and (iii) the Defendant gave 10,000,000 won to Defendant 1 and 106,000,000 won of the judgment of the lower court.”