A. On January 16, 2015, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the head, etc. of the victim D (at that time, 42 to 43 years old) who was in a de facto marital relationship at the time of drinking on the ground that he was suffering from stress in the place of work in the dwelling of the Defendant of the apartment apartment unit C, in Gansi-si, Gandong-si, Gandong-si, on the ground that he was subject to work stress. In several times, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc., requiring medical treatment for about

B. On February 27, 2015, the Defendant would not have the victim’s home near the victim’s home in racing-si, on February 27, 2015, as the victim’s residence living together with the Defendant.

For the reason that the two descendants followed the victim's timber, forced the victim to move into the vehicle, and forced the victim to the adjacent area of the Daegu-dong-gu 185-ro 51, the head, etc. of the victim who want to flee was taken to drinking, and the victim's head, etc. who want to flee was put to a brush test that requires treatment for about 14 days for the victim.

2. As shown in the facts charged, there are written statements by the police against the victim D, written photographs of assault and violence (section 134 to 140 of the investigation record), written diagnosis of injury (section 21 to 23 of the investigation record), and written confirmation of medical treatment (section 76 of the investigation record and page 143 of the investigation record).

However, the Defendant asserted from the investigative agency to the court that no injury was inflicted by assaulting the victim as stated in the facts charged in the instant case.

In this regard, the victim reversed the statement from the defendant that there was no assault as stated in the facts charged, and the victim was physically contacted in the process of admitting the defendant or in the process of causing the defendant to be unaware of the victim, and the defendant was the hedging of the defendant.

On the other hand, I stated to the effect that the appraisal was seriously and unreasonable to file a complaint against the defendant.

The victim's statement in the court is consistent with the defendant's accusation, and there is no evidence to see that the victim's statement in the court is false.