The sentencing of the lower court (a fine of eight million won) is too unhued and unfair.

Judgment

In light of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant had a total of 10 times of criminal punishment, including those punished twice for the same crime; (b) the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for a crime of fraud and was sentenced to two years; (c) the Defendant did not reflect even during the period of repeated crime; and (d) the Defendant committed the instant crime; (c) the Defendant is in profoundly against the Defendant’s intent to commit the instant crime while making a confession; (d) the details of the instant crime do not appear to have a speculative nature or exchange the game outcome; (e) the sentencing balance with the same similar case; and (e) the motive and circumstance leading up to the instant crime; (e) the circumstances following the instant crime; (e) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct; and (e) other various circumstances, which are the conditions for the sentencing specified in the instant records

In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.