2. Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final;

[criminal records] On April 7, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for six months as a crime of fraud in the Daegu District Court’s support, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 27, 2016. On May 13, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for ten months as a crime of fraud, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 21, 2016.

[2] The Defendant was a person who had a relationship with the victim C (V, 44 years of age) and was the victim’s relationship on January 31, 2016, who was the victim of the crime.

The reason was that the victim did not know about the dispute, and the victim was forced to avoid the contact, which led to an efficiencies.

1. On February 2, 201, the Defendant violated the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc.: (a) on the following grounds; (b) on the part of the Defendant’s mobile phone number using the Defendant’s mobile phone, and (c) on the part of the victim’s mobile phone number, “The first two vehicles are well known to the driver’s parents, and the second vehicle seems to have known to the driver’s parents of the entire part so far; and (b) where the width goes to go.

(i)the same month from the point of the day above, including sending text messages that arouse the fear and apprehension of the content of the words and make them delivered;

3. From 10:50 up to 65 times in total, the Defendant’s mobile phone numbers were sent to the victim text messages that arouse fears or apprehensions by using the victim’s mobile phone numbers, such as the list of crimes in the annexed sheet.

As a result, the Defendant repeatedly sent words, pictures that arouse fears or apprehensions through information and communications network to the victim.

2. Damage to property;

A. On February 2, 2016, around 16:00, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the Victim’s market price, which was parked in the D dry field, Nam-do, Namnam-do; and (b) was 170,000 won at the front glass of the E-Vehicle’s front glass.

B. The defendant is the victim's market price owned by the defendant 450. The defendant was parked on the road of the Donnamnam-do, Donnam-do.