도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a foreigner of the nationality of business bestan.
1. On November 26, 2015, the Defendant illegally used a motor vehicle: (a) on the road No. 485-way road as the center line of Ansan-si, a member of Ansan-si, Asan-si, and (b) on the road in which the victim B walked the C B’s cargo truck, thereby driving the motor vehicle by driving the motor vehicle in a way of turning off the motor vehicle and repeating the truth.
Accordingly, the defendant used the above vehicle temporarily without the consent of the victim.
2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) and the Road Traffic Act, without a driver’s license, drive the said cargo while repeatedly driving the vehicle, as described in paragraph (1), at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), and as described in paragraph (1).
At all times, since vehicles are parked on the front side, there was a duty of care to confirm the safety of the direction of the driving and prevent accidents.
However, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, shocked the back part of the EK3 car owned by the injured party D, which was parked in the front bend of the foregoing cargo vehicle, into the front part of the foregoing cargo vehicle, and the victim B, which was in the rear part, with the rear part of the cargo vehicle loaded.
The Defendant damaged the above K3 car by negligence in the course of business so that the repair cost of the above 7.80,000 won, such as the replacement of the front driver, can be caused by the tension of the repair cost to the front driver.
3. On November 26, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (e.g., refusal to measure drinking), at a G police box located in Ansan City F from around 20:51 to around 21:32, the Defendant driven the said cargo while under the influence of alcohol, deeming the Defendant’s face is red and the rain-distance at the time of walking to be considered.
The judgment of the court below was requested to take a drinking test by a drinking inspector four times from the police officer affiliated with the above police box, but all of them were rejected.
As a result, the Defendant driven under the influence of alcohol.
reasonable grounds to determine the person.