If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

The defendant is a person who actually operates the public interest-based building B and the public interest-based dispute resolution committee D in the public interest-based building C.

1. On September 2016, the Defendant forged a private document using the “F Tax Accounting Office” in the “F Tax Accounting Office” located in Sinju-si, Cheongju-si, and using the previous “H” type of “H” in the name column of “H”, “H” in the name column of the transferor, “H”, “14.20,” “12,000,” “100,” “1200,000,” “120,000” in the unit price column, “120,000,000,” and “H” in the tax standard column as follows:

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged a standard return on securities transaction tax in H name, which is a private document related to rights and obligations.

2. The Defendants exercised the said investigation document at the Cheongju-si Tax Office prior to the death of Cheongju-gu, 151, which had the said I present the falsified Securities Transaction Standard Report as if it were a document duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statements of H and G, and legal statements of I;

1. Partial statements made by the police in relation to H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the standard return on securities transaction tax, each contract for transfer of stocks, and certificates of seal imprint;

1. Relevant Articles 231, 34(1) (a) (a) of the Criminal Act, Articles 234, 231, and 34(1) (a) of the Criminal Act for criminal facts; the choice of fines for each of the following crimes:

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is 1.