2. In full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant was committed against the confession of the instant crime; (b) the Defendant repeatedly committed the instant crime despite the fact that he/she had been punished for the same kind of crime; (c) the Defendant did not agree with the victim or recover damage; and (d) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive or circumstance of the crime, means and consequence of the crime; (c) the circumstances after the crime; and (d) the record of the crime, etc., the lower court’s sentencing is too too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is groundless.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.