beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2016.07.05 2016고단722

명예훼손

Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is the director of the Busan Southern-gu Housing Redevelopment Project Association and the victim F is the representative of the said Union.

The Defendant was dissatisfied with the demand for perusal and copying of various documents kept by the union while raising various suspicions on the date of the president of the union.

The Defendant, at around 17:00 on June 17, 2015, on the ground that at the office of the above E-Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project Association, the Defendant requested perusal and copying of the “written request for confirmation of obligations” (the document kept by the said victim), the documents kept by the association, and the Defendant ought to treat the victim as waste before the Defendant’s order is maintained by G, the president of the association, H, the secretary of the association, I, the staff of the accounting, and J, the representative, etc.

(E) Eslurged surged surged, brued and surged;

The victim openly insultingd the victim through 30 minutes, “......”

2. The facts charged of this case are crimes falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only when a victim files a complaint pursuant to Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the facts that the victim revokes the complaint against the defendant after the prosecution of this case can be acknowledged. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(5) of the Criminal Procedure Act.