The phrase “the victim,” and the phrase “a dangerous object, and assaulted the victim by carrying a dangerous object towards the victim.”

2. The victim’s investigative agency and legal statement as shown in the facts charged, and the conversation between the defendant, the victim, the police officer, etc. at the time of mobilization of the police officer is CDs.

In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by each evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, it is difficult to believe the part concerning the victim’s statement among the above victim’s statements and conversation CDs as they are, and the remainder of the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to recognize that the Defendant committed an assault against the victim by putting the victim’s insertion in his/her hand, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

① At the time of the instant case, F, who had been present at the scene, did not have a physical contact, such as the Defendant and the victim’s fights with one another, or the body was faced with, but did not have any physical contact. In addition, the Defendant was unable to hear the victim’s hair and did not look at the victim’s hair, and the Defendant was not able to display a insertion toward the victim, and the insertion at the site was in his own possession, and was loaded in the Tracker while leaving the site.

statements are made and are contrary to the statements of the victim.

② According to CCTV images taken from the building located near the site at the time of the instant case, around 10:26:05, the image of the victim was taken from around 10:26 to around 10:29:16. The photograph was suspended from around 10:26 to 10:29:16.