beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.12.03 2015나14775

배당이의

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as follows, and the part of “2.b.(2)” of the first instance judgment shall be cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, inasmuch as it is stated in the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except in the following cases.

2. (2) The auction court of this case prepared a distribution schedule in which the defendant is deemed to be the principal debtor in the real estate of this case with the obligation to secure the property of this case and to pay the remainder from the auction proceeds of the shares owned by the defendant among the real estate of this case. The issue of this case is whether the defendant can be deemed to be the principal debtor not the principal debtor of the loan of this case. The issue of this case is whether the principal debtor can be deemed to be the principal debtor not the principal debtor of the loan of this case. The interpretation of the intention of this case clearly establishes the objective meaning which the parties to the contract have assigned to the act of indicating the contract. The interpretation of the intention of this case is to clearly determine the objective meaning which the parties to the contract has already prepared in writing of the disposal document, and it is not to be bound by the phrases used in writing, but to reasonably interpret the objective meaning that the parties have given to the act of expressing the contract, regardless of the party's internal intent, and in this case, it is clear that the objective meaning of the text of this case is clear.