60 million won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

The defendant.

The Defendant knew that C was prepared to carry out a warehouse business for the purpose of the business of storing speculative entertainment, which is a seized object, and tried to acquire money and valuables by deceiving the said victim, as if he was able to carry out a warehouse business of storing speculative entertainment, which is a seized object, by requesting the police higher level upon request.

On December 2, 2010, the Defendant, at the “F” restaurant of the E’s operation in Daejeon-gu Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, stating, “The head of Kusan-gu Police Station G is a high-fluorial Gu, and the head of Kusan-dong Police Station H is close to the extent that he visits each other to the house, and the same applies to the head of the Daejeon-dong Police Station.” On the request of police officers, the Defendant belonged to the victim as if he would allow the Defendant to carry out a warehouse business that enables the Defendant to keep a speculative amusement machine, which is a seized object, to the extent that he could visit each other.”

On January 1, 201, the Defendant received KRW 3 million from the victim for activity expenses, etc., on the ground that, at the J office of the Daejeon-dong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City sales store, the Defendant: “In order to carry out a warehouse business for the custody of speculative amusement equipment, which is a seized object, it is necessary to make gifts to the police higher level; and that the Defendant received KRW 3 million from the victim.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to let the victim carry out the warehouse business of custody of speculative entertainment, which is a seized object, by requesting the senior police officer to the senior police officer.

Defendant from that time to that time,

3. By the end of 30.30, the victim received the total sum of KRW 60 million from the victim on six occasions as shown in the attached list of crimes in the above manner, and received money and valuables under the pretext of soliciting the affairs handled by the public officials at the same time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness C and E;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on account transactions in one bank;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act (Fraud) and the Attorney-at-Law Act concerning facts constituting an offense.