특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a vehicle B in a lerabert B.
On December 2, 2019, the Defendant driven the above car on December 21, 2019, and led to moving the private distance from Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to C from the side of D elementary school to C.
At the time, the signal, etc. is a private-distance intersection where the signal, etc. is installed, and the defendant was at the time to make a right-hand, so there was a duty of care to make a right-hand after checking the right-hand and the right-hand side to the person engaged in driving of the motor vehicle.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded to the right side from the left side by the negligence of the Defendant’s failure and led to the victim E (70 years of age) driving to the right side on the left side, and received the front part of the victim E (70 years of age) driving with the front part of the above leper of the said leper of the vehicle.
Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, caused the victim to suffer injury, such as light fluoral salt, which requires treatment for about two weeks, and, at the same time, escaped without immediately stopping a vehicle from a sofurged to the extent of KRW 1,169,034, such as pentum exchange, while destroying a motor vehicle with a sofurgy, without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim.
Summary of Evidence
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of a medical certificate and a written estimate of the actual condition of the defendant's statement;
1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime;
1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;
1. It shall be decided as ordered for the reason that Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that comprehensive insurance is subscribed and that two million won is deposited for the recovery of damage, etc.) is higher than that of the Criminal Act;