2. In full view of the following facts: (a) the amount of fraud by the instant crime was not specified as KRW 30 million; (b) the damage was not recovered even after a long time has passed since the instant crime; and (c) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, the background and consequence of the instant crime; and (d) the circumstances after the instant crime were committed; and (b) comprehensively taking into account all the sentencing conditions as indicated in the records and arguments, such as the circumstances after the instant crime, etc., the Defendant is against the instant crime; and (c) the equity is taken into account when the judgment was rendered simultaneously with each

Even if the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable, it is not likely that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.