공증인법위반
Defendants shall be punished by a fine of two million won.
Defendant
If A does not pay the above fine, 100,000.
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A From 2000 to 200, a notary public is an attorney-at-law who has been engaged in notarial affairs as an attorney-at-law in charge of law belonging to the law firm B, and the defendant notary public is a law firm B (representative attorney-at-law C) established by the Minister of Justice around 199 with the purpose of obtaining authorization for the establishment of a law firm
1. Where an attorney-at-law in charge of conducting notarial affairs certifies the minutes of a general meeting, etc. of corporations attached to the application documents when filing for registration of the corporation, he/she shall attend the place of resolution of the relevant corporation and examine the procedures for and details of the resolution, hear statements as to whether the contents of the minutes conform to the truth at the request of a quorum or more necessary for the resolution from among those who made the relevant resolution, or their agents, hear statements from among those who made the relevant resolution, and have the client or his/her agent confirm the signatures or seals of the minutes in front of the notary public, and verify
Nevertheless, on July 2, 2013, the Defendant held a meeting on June 29, 2013 by a notary public in Young-gu E at a law firm B office, which was requested by the commission agent F, a medical corporation employee of the Civil and Medical Foundation, and certified the minutes of the above temporary board of directors without verifying the date and time of resolution of the board of directors to the representative director who prepared a written statement, although the date and time of resolution of the board of directors are unclear, or without verifying it to the entrusting agent.
Accordingly, the defendant violated the Notary Public Act.
2. The notary public law as to the affairs of the authorized notary public, as described in the preceding paragraph, is the attorney-at-law in charge of authentication of the defendant law firm B (representative attorney-at-law C).