과실치상
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
On October 16, 2012, at around 13:00, the Defendant had a duty of care to keep people from unauthorizedly keeping the neck when he raises the above dog in the breeding place or raises it outside the outside. In addition, the Defendant had a duty of care to keep people from unauthorized unauthorized keeping the neck when he raises it in the breeding place or raises it outside the outside.
Nevertheless, when the victim D (the age of 64) who neglected this and left the Defendant, tried to move the d (the age of 64) parked on the front side of the container gambling room located in the above C, the Defendant did not notify the victim of the risk, such as that the above d (the above d) has increased by combining the above dial lines more parallelly than ordinary times, and caused the victim to suffer from the heat of the reproductive instrument that requires treatment for about 40 days by neglecting the above divers to the victim without notifying the victim of the risk.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;
1. Statement of D police statement;
1. A medical certificate or an injury medical certificate;
1. Investigation report (to be accompanied by site guards and field photographs);
1. Field photographs, etc.;
1. Determination as to the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel of the injured party
1. The alleged victim does not want to help the defendant, and entered his/her dog into the opening counterscope, and the defendant tried to make the breeding house, but did not make it because the victim does not need to make it. Thus, there is no negligence on the defendant.
2. The circumstances revealed by each evidence mentioned above, namely, the victim’s place where the accident occurred, can easily be accessed by anyone because the entrance is not installed, and the Defendant’s dog raised had a aggressive tendency. Therefore, the Defendant raised the dog at an open place as above.