(a) V.V. 93/417 shares of Plaintiff (143/417 shares), WW (28/417 shares), Defendant F (38/417 shares), Defendant D (9/417 shares), Defendant G (49/417 shares), Defendant G (49/417 shares), Defendant B (5/417 shares), Defendant D14/47/47 shares, Plaintiff H(1/47/47 shares, Defendant D147/47 shares, Defendant D147/47 shares, Defendant D147/47 (49/47 shares), Defendant D147/47 shares, and Defendant D147/47 (49/47 shares), respectively, as the shares of Plaintiff (143/417 shares), Plaintiff I (28/417 shares), Defendant D1 (9/417 shares), Defendant D2 (9/417 shares, Plaintiff A/47/417/417 shares, and Defendant D142/47/47/47/414) shares.

(hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant lands”) B.

W died on December 20, 1980, and the defendant Z (1/13 of the inheritance), AA (1/13 of the inheritance), AB (1/13 of the inheritance), AF (6/13 of the inheritance), U (4/13 of the inheritance) succeeded to the property.

AC died on June 10, 1992, and succeeded to the property of Defendant K, Defendant L, Defendant M, Defendant N, Defendant N, Defendant E, Defendant E, DefendantO, Defendant T and AG according to their respective 1/8 shares of inheritance. On August 22, 2010, the above AG died on August 22, 2010, and succeeded to the property of Defendant P (Inheritance 3/9), Defendant Q, Defendant R, Defendant R and Defendant S (Inheritance 2/9 shares of inheritance).

C. The Plaintiff and other co-owners did not reach an agreement on the method of dividing each of the instant lands.

[Ground] As a result of the fact-finding conducted on March 29, 2017 with respect to Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the permanent residential market, the purport of the entire pleadings, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Determination

A. In accordance with Article 269(1) of the Civil Act, the Plaintiff, a co-owner of each of the instant lands, may claim the partition of each of the instant lands against the Defendants, who are other co-owners.