The defendant is a person subject to a call for military force mobilization training.

On May 19, 2017, the Defendant, within his company located in Ssung City B around 18:21, did not enlist in the above designated date and time without justifiable grounds, even after receiving a notice of convening a call for military force mobilization training under the name of the head of the Military Affairs Administration, which caused military forces mobilization training conducted in a company for telecommunications dissemination from June 27, 2017 to June 29, 2017 through its own e-mail.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of accuser C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the public notice of convening a training for the mobilization of military forces, copy of a list of call-up for training for the mobilization of military forces, and the result of issuing a

1. Article 90 (1) of the relevant Act on criminal facts and Article 90 of the Military Service Act on the Selection of Punishment (Optional to Penalty);

1. A fine of 700,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 59 (1) of the Suspension of Sentence (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2007Do1148, Apr. 1, 2007)