상해
[Defendant A] Imprisonment with prison labor for six months
[Defendant B] The defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.
Defendant.
Punishment of the crime
1. On February 2, 2017, Defendant A, at around 21:35, 2017, told the victim B (here, 34 years of age) of the “F cafeteria” located in Hongcheon-gun E, the Defendant was at the time when the victim B (here, 34 years of age) took the influence of alcohol and her desire to do so.
On the other hand, the victim had the victim go beyond three times in prison with his her son, and the defendant again had the victim go beyond the victim.
As a result, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as a th week therapy.
2. Defendant B assaulted himself as above at the above date, time, and place, the victim A (V, 40 years of age) and set up against him, and assaulted on the part of the victim at the time and place.
Summary of Evidence
[Defendant A]
1. The defendant A's partial statement
1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect by a part of the prosecution against the defendant A;
1. Partial statement of the witness B;
1. Partial statement of witness G;
1. Protocols of partial police statements related to G;
1. 112 Declarations, investigative reports (Attachment of a medical certificate of injury), pictures related to the case, investigation reports (Attachment of photographs on the part of the suspect B), investigation reports (Submission of suspect A monetary recording usb) / [Defendant B];
1. Defendant B’s legal statement
1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect by a part of the prosecution against the defendant A;
1. Partial statement of witness G;
1. Application of the statutes governing the photograph of the case / [Defendant A]
1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment [Defendant B]
1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. Determination as to Defendant A’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act
1. The defendant asserts that there was no fact that he had the victim go beyond the victim by three times, and rather, he was placed on the floor as stated on the floor.
2. Therefore, the judgment is based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court.