However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 14, 2017, the Defendant: (a) caused a traffic accident involving an Indian boundary while driving a motor vehicle of CNAS CV on or around October 14, 2017 and driving a motor vehicle of CVS on the roads adjacent to the subway viewing station in Seo-gu Daejeon by causing the traffic accident involving an Indian boundary; and (b) was on the back of the said motor vehicle.

D In the event of the occurrence of an accident, the victim E (38 years old) who is the same person in the workplace of the D, in front of the Gu University Hospital, Seo-gu, Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon on the same day, suffered from the tear tear injury, and the victim E (38 years old) who is the same person in the workplace of the D was not driving under the influence of alcohol.

He heard that he would report to the police, tried to leave the time zone of the No.N. car at the above No.S. No.S. car, and the victim was able to attach a part of the No.S. car to the above No.S. car, which is a dangerous object with knowledge of this, and 10 meters later after the victim was sent to the above No.S. car, which is a dangerous object, and the victim was removed from the floor.

As a result, the Defendant carried dangerous things and inflicted bodily injury on the victim, who is in need of approximately 2 weeks of treatment, shoulder booms, side booms, water booms, water booms, and tensions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement in the police statement protocol against E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes written diagnosis of injury;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Taking into account the following factors: (a) the observation of protection and community service order; and (b) the recognition of one’s own crime on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act; and Article 32(3) of the Act on the Protection, Observation, etc. of Social Service Orders; (c) the victim’s injury injury level and degree; and (d