The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning, the lower court’s rejection of the Defendant’s assertion on the mental and physical disorder on the grounds stated in its reasoning is justifiable and did not err as otherwise alleged in the grounds of appeal.

In addition, examining various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records, such as the Defendant’s age character and character intelligence and environment, relationship with the victim, motive means and consequence of the instant crime, etc., it cannot be deemed extremely unfair to maintain the judgment of the first instance court that sentenced the Defendant 25 years of imprisonment, even in light of the circumstances asserted on the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.