If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Around 00:25 on January 8, 2017, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol in front of Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, while patroling the place where the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, and did not respond to the personal information of the police officer assigned to the Seoul Song-gu Police Station D police station, Seoul, which tried to have the Defendant returned home while trying to the Defendant, and rather tried to see the her on the road without complying with the personal information. As such, the Defendant saw the her on the road from the above E to see the her on the road, and without any justifiable reason, she saw the horses that she seen the her on the road at the nearby police station, and she saw the horses that she seen the her on the road, and interfered with the legitimate performance of public duties related to the above E’s patrol duties as a police official.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of the witness E’s legal statement statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts and the selection of punishment (the crime of this case is a crime that undermines the function of the State by nullifying legitimate exercise of public authority, and thus requires the strict punishment of the defendant. However, the degree of exercise of tangible power by the defendant against a police officer is not relatively more severe, contingent crimes appear as contingent crimes, and there are no criminal records of the same kind and no criminal records of punishment exceeding imprisonment without prison labor, etc.).

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;