Of the facts charged of this case, the prosecution against assault is dismissed.

On June 30, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for habitual assault at the Gwangju District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Gwangju District Court on May 17, 2017.

The Defendant, at around 20:50 on August 21, 2018, while drinking two-hours from “Csing room” in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu, about two-hours, listened to the horses from the victim D, who is the business owner, “Aisra, only if he was under influence of alcohol,” and released the fluor’s disease from the cooling house to the inner floor of the fluor’s disease, putting the part of the bottle of the fluor’s disease, and putting the victim into a fluor, and putting the fluor’s disease into a fluor, as the fluor.

“.....”

As a result, the defendant carried dangerous objects and expressed his attitude that he seems to inflict harm on the victim's life and body.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Some statements made to the accused in the protocol of interrogation of the suspect against the prosecution;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. On-site photographs;

1. A previous conviction: A criminal history inquiry and investigation report (the criminal defendant and his/her defense counsel shall file a report on the previous conviction of a criminal suspect) (the criminal defendant and his/her defense counsel shall carry dangerous articles at the time and time as indicated in

However, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, after the defendant putting the main disease into the floor at the time and at the place of the ruling, the defendant saw the victim as "the death."

"," and it is recognized that the injured party has reported the threat to the police.

Therefore, the defendant and his defense counsel's assertion is not accepted.

1. Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The reason for sentencing Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes is that the defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of the period of repeated crimes, that the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant by agreement with the victim after the occurrence of the case, and the age, sex, environment of the defendant.