난민불인정결정취소
1. The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The court's explanation concerning this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the court's explanation concerning this case is acceptable as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420
(1) The plaintiffs appealed that the Canadian and European countries recognize Canadian and Canadian as refugee and the Chinese government continue to be stuffed against religious activities, and therefore the plaintiffs' status should be recognized as refugee. However, even if the evidence submitted in the first instance court is examined, the plaintiffs' evidence submitted in the first instance court is justifiable and it is so decided that the plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. The plaintiffs' appeal is justified and it is dismissed as it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all.