However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. From January 2010 to May 5, 2010, the Defendant: (a) operated a “D” restaurant with a business operator registered in the name of “D”, which was located in the name of “D”, located in the fifth floor of the building B in Busan-gu, Busan; (b) on the basis that the said C’s seal impression is kept with the head of the office and the certificate of seal impression, the Defendant had the intent

around September 201, the Defendant: (a) took place in the foregoing “D” as if the Defendant was C; (b) made a loan application for a business fund granted by the employee in charge of loaning modern capital from the employee in charge of loaning the name of the Defendant; (c) the name of the customer: E: Business name; (d) the name of the business: the second floor of the B building in Busan Metropolitan Government; (b) the name of the business site; (c) the name of the business site; (d) the name of the customer: the second floor of the B building in Busan Metropolitan City; (d) the name of the settlement bank; (c) H; (d) the name of the settlement bank in Busan Metropolitan City; (d) the name of the bank; (e) the relationship with the contractor: I; (d) the principal; and (e) the applicant: 10 million won; and (c) the applicant’s name.

As a result, the Defendant, for the purpose of uttering, forged a letter of application for a loan of modern capital capital in the name of another person C, which is a private document related to the duty of rights, and accordingly, the Defendant, as indicated in the attached list of crimes, committed the same four times from September 201 to January 25, 201, respectively, by the same method.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), presented a forged C’s loan application in the above-mentioned name at the time and place, and exercised the use by presenting it to the employee in charge of Hyundai Capital Loan who did not know the forged fact. In addition, the Defendant exercised an application for a loan in the name of C, which was forged in the same manner four times from September 201 to January 25, 2012, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Table.

3. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, made a false statement to the employee in charge of modern capital loaning (the State) as if the Defendant was the above C, and thereby forged C.