At around 15:00 on October 2, 2013, the Defendant stated the content of “this store 202 is a store that has not paid many management expenses, and is not capable of doing funeral services due to the entry of electricity,” in red in the paper No. 14, the Defendant attached the entrance door of the victim No. 202 on the second floor and caused a person to view it by attaching the relevant printed matter (hereinafter “the instant printed matter”) to damage the credit of the victim by fraudulent means to mislead the victim of the ability or intent to pay, and interfere with the business of leasing the commercial building.”

2. We examine the judgment. D’s statement in the police investigation to the effect that the Defendant, with red fences at the time, entered the same content as the facts charged in the instant case in A4 by hand, and prepared the instant printed matter in A4 (in the investigation record No. 47) is difficult to believe it as it is in light of the statements (in the investigation record No. 43) and the situation at the time of the investigation by the police investigation by the Licensed Real Estate Agent E, a witness of the printed matter, and the circumstances of the accusation. The remaining evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to acknowledge that the Defendant prepared the instant printed matter, and there is

Rather, according to the records, the defendant, at the time of 202 shop management office, did not pay management expenses for a considerable period of time at the shop, the head of the commercial building management office, and after taking a fractional measure for the above shop pursuant to the management regulations of the commercial building management office, "this store is cut off with the unpaid management expenses, and is cut off in the name of the management office."