beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2020.09.25 2019고정1262

사기

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 2017, the Defendant tried to perform the construction site civil works under the name of the company called "D" in relation to the construction of a new construction of a major complex building in Busan Jin-gu, Busan. However, although D did not hold a specific construction license, C did not have a new construction license, and C was placed in the situation where it is required to select a new civil construction company.

At that time, the Defendant, who was the head of the headquarters of C, was requested by E, who was the head of the first site of the above site, to “I will continue to take charge of the civil works to be in charge of the continuous progress of construction work,” and was able to do so as if he was the head of C’s site, and to do so under his name, and to live in the site.

On the 31st of the same month, the Defendant, at the same time, made a false statement to the victim G who operates F at the site of the construction of the above main complex building, stating that “In this construction site, I would like to do so, I would like to send a quotation, and submitted a quotation, etc. sent by the victim to C, and followed it as if he was F officer or employee.

As above, while the Defendant deceiving the victim and caused F to carry out civil engineering works by entering into a subordinate contract with C, the Defendant falsely concluded that, upon deposit of the construction cost from C around November 23, 2017, “The payment of the construction cost has been made from C, which is in need of living expenses, is being carried out in the childcare center construction in Busan Shipping Authority, but if the payment of the construction cost has been made, it would be paid with the construction cost of the shipping substitute childcare center.”

However, in fact, the defendant was not the field director of C, and he was thought to use the money borrowed from the victim for the cost of living with no clear ability at the time, and even if he borrowed money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to pay it.

The Defendant deceivings the victim as above.