except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. At around 13:00 on November 17, 2010, the Defendant forged private documents, preparing a resume for the purpose of using it in D’C car page located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and entered “E” and “F” in the name column.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged one resume in the name of E, a private document concerning a certificate of fact.

2. At around November 17, 2010, the Defendant exercised the falsified curriculum as if it was duly formed with I who knew of the forgery in order to use it for employment at the Ha’s Gowon located in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu Seoul.

3. At around November 18, 2010, the Defendant: (a) stolen the victim I’s cash worth KRW 7.50,000,000, located in the Ha’s office located in the said Ha’s office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the accused in the first protocol of trial;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. A written statement of I;

1. Application of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes to forged resumes and investigative reporting;

1. Relevant Articles 329, 231, and 234 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act or more (incompetence, recovery of damage, agreed points);