학원의설립ㆍ운영및과외교습에관한법률위반
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable in light of the following: (a) the Defendant is faced with an difficult economic situation; (b) the Defendant was faced with this case to reduce the economic burden of the children; (c) there is no criminal power against the Defendant; and (d) the Defendant suffers from the heart color and the health of the Defendant is very good.
2. The Criminal Procedure Act, which takes the trial-oriented principle and the direct principle, ought to respect the determination of sentencing in cases where there exists a unique area of the first instance court, and there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion.
(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015). Even if the materials submitted in the trial at the trial, there is no significant change in the sentencing conditions compared to the original judgment, and comprehensively taking account of all the factors indicated in the records of this case, the lower court’s sentencing is too unreasonable to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.